DLP isn't so bad after all
From korrekt.org
Pascal Hitzler, Peter Haase, Markus Krötzsch, York Sure, Rudi Studer
DLP isn't so bad after all
Abstract. We discuss some of the recent controversies concerning the DLP fragment of OWL. We argue that it is a meaningful fragment and can serve as a basic interoperability layer between OWL and logic programming-based ontology languages.
Published at OWLED2005 (Workshop paper)
Download PDF (last update: November 1 2005)
Citation details
- Pascal Hitzler, Peter Haase, Markus Krötzsch, York Sure, Rudi Studer. DLP isn't so bad after all. In Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks, Bijan Parsia, Peter Patel-Schneider, eds.: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED-05). CEUR Workshop ProceedingsProperty "Publisher" has a restricted application area and cannot be used as annotation property by a user. 2005.
Remarks
This is just a four page position paper. For a more in-depth treatment of DLP, see the paper On the Semantic Relationship between Datalog and Description Logics as well as my dissertation.
